by Norm » Fri Oct 28, 2011 10:02 am
I have to derail just a little bit here.
"... how Ray Cummins expressed himself recently, directly opposing many of the posts I've seen on this topic..."
It wasn't Ray's opinions on action height that bothered me. Opinions on action is relative to the individual's feelings on the matter.
What bothered me (and many others) was his condecending opening line "...I just want to put to bed the story going around about Chet's action is high..."
It wasn't a "story going around". It was a series of direct observations made and posted here over the years by Chet's longtime sideman and very close friend Paul Yandell. Ray's statement implying that Chet always recorded direct also flies in the face of Paul's postings about Chet's recording methods combining mics and amps over the years, also posted here.
Is it really that important? Yes and No.
No, because, again, action and recording methods are fluid and changing and changable things.
Yes, it is important, however, for serious students of Things Chet, not all of whom are guitarists. The way he did things with what his times and tools had to offer are worthy of study and accuracy IS important.
I got that off my chest. I apologize for bringing this all up again.